As part of our new phase of fourth-wave pandemic precautions, we’re not making salons or workshops in real life here in Vietnam for the time being.
That means it’s a time to go back into the internet. So, we’re setting up a new set of tracks for S P A C E for Summer and Autumn collections. For example, this is a snippet from a popular science fiction work, ‘The Time Machine.’
Never read it, before. But, having just now started it, (see below, with the Introduction), am happy. Isn’t it grand that this first part is about… whoa!, the Fourth Dimension! S P A C E quests S P A C E, and A. Spaice loves this stuff. Naturally. It is the nature of geometers to be curious about things. So here we are. And here we go. Gonna keep diving into the internet, maybe, to share more. Strange Geometries, these.
The Time Machine
Words H. G. Wells
The Time Traveller (for so it will be convenient to speak of him) was expounding a recondite matter to us. His pale grey eyes shone and twinkled, and his usually pale face was flushed and animated. The fire burnt brightly, and the soft radiance of the incandescent lights in the lilies of silver caught the bubbles that flashed and passed in our glasses. Our chairs, being his patents, embraced and caressed us rather than submitted to be sat upon, and there was that luxurious after-dinner atmosphere, when thought runs gracefully free of the trammels of precision.
And he put it to us in this way—marking the points with a lean forefinger—as we sat and lazily admired his earnestness over this new paradox (as we thought it) and his fecundity.
“You must follow me carefully. I shall have to controvert one or two ideas that are almost universally accepted. The geometry, for instance, they taught you at school is founded on a misconception.”
“Is not that rather a large thing to expect us to begin upon?” said Filby, an argumentative person with red hair.
“I do not mean to ask you to accept anything without reasonable ground for it. You will soon admit as much as I need from you. You know of course that a mathematical line, a line of thickness nil, has no real existence. They taught you that? Neither has a mathematical plane. These things are mere abstractions.”
“That is all right,” said the Psychologist.
“Nor, having only length, breadth, and thickness, can a cube have a real existence.”
“There I object,” said Filby. “Of course a solid body may exist. All real things—”
“So most people think. But wait a moment. Can aninstantaneous cube exist?”
“Don’t follow you,” said Filby.
“Can a cube that does not last for any time at all, have a real existence?”
Filby became pensive. “Clearly,” the Time Traveller proceeded, “any real body must have extension in fourdirections: it must have Length, Breadth, Thickness, and—Duration. But through a natural infirmity of the flesh, which I will explain to you in a moment, we incline to overlook this fact. There are really four dimensions*, three which we call the three planes of Space, and a fourth, Time.
There is, however, a tendency to draw an unreal distinction between the former three dimensions and the latter, because it happens that our consciousness moves intermittently in one direction along the latter from the beginning to the end of our lives.”
“That,” said a very young man, making spasmodic efforts to relight his cigar over the lamp; “that . . . very clear indeed.”
“Now, it is very remarkable that this is so extensively overlooked,” continued the Time Traveller, with a slight accession of cheerfulness. “Really this is what is meant by the Fourth Dimension, though some people who talk about the Fourth Dimension do not know they mean it. It is only another way of looking at Time. There is no difference between Time and any of the three dimensions of Space except that our consciousness moves along it. But some foolish people have got hold of the wrong side of that idea. You have all heard what they have to say about this Fourth Dimension?”
“I have not,” said the Provincial Mayor.
“It is simply this. That Space, as our mathematicians have it, is spoken of as having three dimensions, which one may call Length, Breadth, and Thickness, and is always definable by reference to three planes, each at right angles to the others. But some philosophical people have been asking why three dimensions particularly—why not another direction at right angles to the other three?—and have even tried to construct a Four-Dimensional geometry.
Professor Simon Newcomb was expounding this to the New York Mathematical Society only a month or so ago. You know how on a flat surface, which has only two dimensions, we can represent a figure of a three-dimensional solid, and similarly they think that by models of three dimensions they could represent one of four—if they could master the perspective of the thing. See?”
*Sometime soon, I will share with you what HL said to me in Cameron Highlands about there being actually ten dimensions. HL is a smart-as-anything quantum physics academic, a fellow wanderer-into-Highlands, and a fascinating person to share conversions with. I’ll have to send her this link and seeeee what she sayyyyssss. These days it’s so hard to talk to people online. Why is that? Oh, righhhttttt. Because most people writing online most of the time are totally bullshitting. That’s why you have to be kind of skeptical. I get it. Anyway. HL, hang on, I’ll draft an email… To be continued… in S P A C E. More and better S P A C E is ahead. We’re designing the editorial calendar for 2021 as I write this. There’s a whole page with the updated information on the crowdfunding link, which is this: http://chuffed.org/project/spacethezine. Checkit. Cool.